How to Write a Summary of an Article? To what extent is this true in two areas of knowledge?
To what extent is this true in two areas of knowledge? My personal opinion states that doubt is a state of mind, between belief and disbelief, which involves uncertainty or distrust. Doubt involves the questioning of a perceived notion.
It opens one to inquisition and compels a reassessment of a given truth, allowing for improved revisions, thereby furthering gains in knowledge. This process is continued until one finds grounds by which they can be satisfied with.
This essay will seek to address the extent to which doubt is manifested as a key to knowledge regarding two areas of knowledge, Science and History. Science, according to Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary, is a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws obtained and tested through the scientific method and concerned with the phenomena observed in the physical world.
Science, through the course of history, has been a tried and tested means of gaining knowledge; through experiments, regarded by the scientific community, as a means to derive truth from the unknown and Doubt is the key to knowledge tok establish facts.
The scientific community will vigorously doubt and criticize any ideas until enough evidence is produced to back them up. Thus, is knowledge in science then, provisional?
Provisional, means to allow for falsifications. Theories with enough logic can falsify previously held standing knowledge. My stand is that through doubt, science is indeed provisional. The basis of the progress of Science is through inferred or possibly imagined hypotheses, by scientists attempting to determine and establish meaning to the unexplained.
These will then be experimented upon through scientific procedures, and any positive conclusions drawn henceforth will then be ascertained as theories.
Theories held as scientific knowledge will remain so until they are doubted and contested against; challenged by new experiments and exploration into areas opposing the theory in question. Throughout the history of Science, knowledge has been derived from the selfsame processes.
In early Mesopotamian study, the Earth was believed to be a flat disk with a dome, until Ferdinand Magellan managed to prove that Earth was spherical after successfully circumnavigating the Earth in the 15th Century.
Another example would be of the Italian physicist Galileo Galilei who, despite the endless controversy, criticism and denouncing made against him, proved false the long withheld notion of the geocentric view that the Earth was at the center of the Universe.
Thus, it is evident that through the use of scientific theories, unless disproved otherwise, knowledge is updated and will remain as such through continual doubt.
Therefore even after scientific theories are propagated into laws, new methods will always be discovered which can challenge them as long as one continues to doubt. For my argument to hold true however, certain assumptions and implications have to be made.
Firstly, for doubt to succeed as a key to unlocking knowledge in Science, one must persevere in doubting until satisfied by reliable scientific experimental results whether in support of or opposition of the theory in question. Also, methods used to contest previously held theories have to be recognized and accepted by the scientific community otherwise any significance findings from the research cannot be acknowledged.
Thus, theories to contest concurrent theories must be definite and not ambiguous, or subjects of debate, that will prove detrimental to the attainment of knowledge. Doubt alone cannot lead to the development of new scientific theories; however doubt is absolutely essential in verifying and hence justifying hypotheses into theories and theories into laws.
That said, it is conceivable that certain theories or laws remain in a gray area and are unable to be proven with enough logic to be held as knowledge, and, as such have to be held as the truth. The theory of the black hole for example, is as of yet, unable to be proven by man. However, one of the many theories of the black hole might actually be true but as nobody can prove it so, scientists in the field may invest pointless effort into developing new theories instead of directing that effort into proving the theory, which is actually true.
Hence, continual doubt might actually lead to the elimination of the correct theory, resulting in a regression of knowledge.
Thus, although doubt lends to the progress of science and hence knowledge, it also has limitations which might prove detrimental to the growth of knowledge. History, according to the Random House Dictionary, is defined as a branch of knowledge dealing with past events relating to a particular people, country, period, person and especially in connection with the human race.
History, similar to science, is also provisional to a certain extent. Historians can always interpret events relating to the past differently as they take conflicting stances. These interpretations are influenced by the evidence historians have gathered relating to the event, and thus are easily subjected to change as new findings are discovered, just as entirely different perspectives can be derived from the new material.
Hence, this attests to the presence of doubt in historical study.In this essay, I will examine the Areas of Knowledge of the natural sciences and religion to determine the extent to which doubt is the key to knowledge and I will propose a complementary view that doubt may not be the only key.
Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge Words Feb 4th, 2 Pages However, being human, we make mistakes and not all of these “proven” knowledge claims hold true. “Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge” (Persian Proverb).
to What Extent Is This True in Two Areas of Knowledge? “Doubt is the key to knowledge” (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true in two areas of knowledge? As a Persian proverb once said to have progress in knowledge it is necessary to doubt. Doubt is the key to knowledge” (Persian Proverb).
To what extent is this true in two areas of knowledge? Firstly, to understand fully the proverb, definitions should be given. Aug 18, · Nonetheless, through careful study and research on these various areas of knowledge, this essay presents the stand that doubt, to a large extent, is an indispensable and important factor as the key to knowledge.
Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge Words Feb 4th, 2 Pages However, being human, we make mistakes and not all of these “proven” knowledge claims hold true.